Drag Race Cars

6 responses so far ↓

• james

  Sep 11, 2010 at 6:20 am

  

  Top thrill dragster is AWESOME!! Millennium Force is BETTER!!!!!! Mean streak is way to rough and not very fun, even though it looks like fun
• oz999

  Sep 11, 2010 at 6:40 am

  

  i was lyin but there is a roller coaster in las vagas 909ft in the air
• Blake Tuohy

  Sep 11, 2010 at 10:57 pm

  

  Well I was at Cedar Point yesterday for my birthday, and I saw Miley Cyrus on the roller coaster “Top Thrill Dragster”. I was in the line, just about to get on, when all of a sudden, there was like five body guards, and twenty people or so, all in a group. I was wondering what was going on and why the ride was not going, when all of a sudden I saw her! She was there with some friends, and probably family also, but I didn’t know who they were. It was a really cool experience, and I was glad that she was there on my Birthday, since I had to wait in line an hour and a half, she made the wait even more worth waiting for! We were literally like four or five feet apart because I was just about to get on the roller coaster, and then she got on it, and rolled by in front of me, so that her coaster could get ready to take off.
• Jacquelyn

  Jul 21, 2011 at 11:47 pm

  

  the majority of Americans, Obama supporters included actually know very little about Mr. Obama and his background. i have been learning a to about his political ambitions and he has planned for this for a long while, even when he was a IL state senator saying that he was not ready or had enough expeience to run..in a 2006 interview with Tim Russert on Meet the Press.

  It's natural to be skeptical of excessive claims about Obama's radical associations. After all, there are so many. But one bears attention — because it helped him get his start in politics. In 1996, he won an Illinois state senate seat on a "fusion" ticket of the Democratic Party and leftist group called the "New Party."

  The New Party, founded in 1992 with 7,000 members at its peak, had been an explicitly anti-capitalist party of ex-Communists, socialists and activists from ACORN, the hard-left group that's constantly in trouble over voter fraud. The New Party didn't ask for Obama's association; he asked for the New Party's endorsement.

  the New Party didn't give its support and campaign volunteers to just anyone. Obama actually had to audition for it. According to a September-October 1995 update on the New Party-aligned Chicago Democratic Socialists of America Web site.

  That raises questions about what was in the New Party platform that drew in Obama. Maybe its own statements saying it was formed "to break the stranglehold that corporate money and corporate media have over the political process."

  Sound familiar? One of the few things Obama reveals in his vague "change" agenda are plans to punish corporations. He rails against "corporate profits" and even worked in a condemnation of them in his first defense of Rev. Jeremiah Wright. So there's little doubt he shares a lot of what the New Party believes.

  Obama should come clean on why he sought these radicals' support and, better still, disclose just how he intends to pay them back.

  Obama was anointed and mentored by William Ayers for a revolutionary purpose. And that REVOLUTON is near. Barack Obama is merely a puppet dangling on the strings of a Socialist agenda.

  Millions of dollars have been bundled and funneled to Obama from George Soros, Tony Rezko, David Axelrod, Auchi and William Ayers, under the "millionaire exception" loopholes. Wake Up! Far Left radicals now control the media outlets and they are attempting to buy the US Presidency. They are furthering their personal agendas by spending their dollars – while Senator Barack Obama is busy making the CHANGE.

  BTW: when he opted out fo public financing, he opted out of lilmits and transparancy…it was not for alturistic purposes as he leads his supporters to beleive. it was advantageous to him..pure and simple.

  obama: the stranger among us. We know little about his past.

  Barack Obama sought the New Party's endorsement knowing it was a radical left organization

  Inside Obama’s Acorn, By their fruits ye shall know them.

  obama: the stranger among us.

  i have a lot more but i know that people prefer videio to article and i know that Obama supporters won't read at all but will dismiss it all as bunk…reading and thinking might be hazzardous to their brain and they might have to make an INFORMED decision rather than blindly follow.
• SallyJM

  Aug 5, 2011 at 5:32 am

  

  the majority of Americans, Obama supporters included actually know very little about Mr. Obama and his background. i have been learning a to about his political ambitions and he has planned for this for a long while, even when he was a IL state senator saying that he was not ready or had enough expeience to run..in a 2006 interview with Tim Russert on Meet the Press.

  It's natural to be skeptical of excessive claims about Obama's radical associations. After all, there are so many. But one bears attention — because it helped him get his start in politics. In 1996, he won an Illinois state senate seat on a "fusion" ticket of the Democratic Party and leftist group called the "New Party."

  The New Party, founded in 1992 with 7,000 members at its peak, had been an explicitly anti-capitalist party of ex-Communists, socialists and activists from ACORN, the hard-left group that's constantly in trouble over voter fraud. The New Party didn't ask for Obama's association; he asked for the New Party's endorsement.

  the New Party didn't give its support and campaign volunteers to just anyone. Obama actually had to audition for it. According to a September-October 1995 update on the New Party-aligned Chicago Democratic Socialists of America Web site.

  That raises questions about what was in the New Party platform that drew in Obama. Maybe its own statements saying it was formed "to break the stranglehold that corporate money and corporate media have over the political process."

  Sound familiar? One of the few things Obama reveals in his vague "change" agenda are plans to punish corporations. He rails against "corporate profits" and even worked in a condemnation of them in his first defense of Rev. Jeremiah Wright. So there's little doubt he shares a lot of what the New Party believes.

  Obama should come clean on why he sought these radicals' support and, better still, disclose just how he intends to pay them back.

  Obama was anointed and mentored by William Ayers for a revolutionary purpose. And that REVOLUTON is near. Barack Obama is merely a puppet dangling on the strings of a Socialist agenda.

  Millions of dollars have been bundled and funneled to Obama from George Soros, Tony Rezko, David Axelrod, Auchi and William Ayers, under the "millionaire exception" loopholes. Wake Up! Far Left radicals now control the media outlets and they are attempting to buy the US Presidency. They are furthering their personal agendas by spending their dollars – while Senator Barack Obama is busy making the CHANGE.

  BTW: when he opted out fo public financing, he opted out of lilmits and transparancy…it was not for alturistic purposes as he leads his supporters to beleive. it was advantageous to him..pure and simple.

  obama: the stranger among us. We know little about his past.

  Barack Obama sought the New Party's endorsement knowing it was a radical left organization

  Inside Obama’s Acorn, By their fruits ye shall know them.

  obama: the stranger among us.

  i have a lot more but i know that people prefer videio to article and i know that Obama supporters won't read at all but will dismiss it all as bunk…reading and thinking might be hazzardous to their brain and they might have to make an INFORMED decision rather than blindly follow.
• Teri D

  Sep 30, 2011 at 10:12 am

  

  I love it. It is oh, so true.

  Although my son is homeschooled (he has health and academic needs that can't feasibly be met in a classroom) and not subject to NCLB, my parents are public school teachers and I grew up helping and tutoring in their classrooms. I was able to be part of some really incredible projects and lessons as a result. However, since the passing of NCLB, they have been unable to integrate such projects and lessons because they have to spend so much time preparing their kids for tesitng.

  I know several excellent teachers who are frustrated by being restricted with NCLB regs; I think it's completely ridiculous. To not allow teachers to do their jobs is shortchanging our children. I agree there needs to be some sort of accountability to improve failing schools, but expecting every one of them to meet some standardized regulation isn't the answer. It's impossible – and wrong – to fully standardize education, and it's time we allowed our educators to do their jobs.